New York City · Medical
IVF & Fertility
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses for this market.
- Mentions
- AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions divided by eligible responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 282 · perplexity/sonar: 282 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 282 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 282
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time IVF & Fertility results
AI responses, all time
5,558
of 64,422 across Atlas · 8.6%
Business mentions, all time
22,652
of 218,877 across Atlas · 10%
Unique businesses ranked, all time
1,512
of 24,531 across Atlas · 6.2%
Unique buyer questions, all time
141
of 1,616 across Atlas · 8.7%
Published ranking editions
13
of 143 across Atlas · 9.1%
Businesses in all-time ranking
1,436
across all eligible responses
These totals cover all published IVF & Fertility research. Unique businesses are counted once across all editions. The all-time ranking uses 5,547 eligible AI responses collected since Jul 13, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
RMA of New York
Claude 692
ChatGPT 829
Gemini 361
Perplexity 528
|
2,410 | 43.4% ±1.3 | 692 | 829 | 361 | 528 |
| #2 |
NYU Langone Fertility Center
Claude 776
ChatGPT 259
Gemini 452
Perplexity 544
|
2,031 | 36.6% ±1.3 | 776 | 259 | 452 | 544 |
| #3 |
Columbia University Fertility Center
Claude 653
ChatGPT 111
Gemini 516
Perplexity 303
|
1,583 | 28.5% ±1.2 | 653 | 111 | 516 | 303 |
| #4 |
CCRM Fertility of New York
Claude 105
ChatGPT 720
Gemini 225
Perplexity 306
|
1,356 | 24.4% ±1.1 | 105 | 720 | 225 | 306 |
| #5 |
Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility
Claude 228
ChatGPT 510
Gemini 347
Perplexity 240
|
1,325 | 23.9% ±1.1 | 228 | 510 | 347 | 240 |
| #6 |
New Hope Fertility Center
Claude 37
ChatGPT 761
Gemini 107
Perplexity 231
|
1,136 | 20.5% ±1.1 | 37 | 761 | 107 | 231 |
| #7 |
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York (RMA NY)
Unverified
Claude 90
ChatGPT 41
Gemini 475
Perplexity 29
|
635 | 11.4% ±0.8 | 90 | 41 | 475 | 29 |
| #8 |
Extend Fertility
Claude 346
ChatGPT 127
Gemini 96
Perplexity 38
|
607 | 10.9% ±0.8 | 346 | 127 | 96 | 38 |
| #9 |
Center for Human Reproduction
Claude 23
ChatGPT 40
Gemini 43
Perplexity 155
|
261 | 4.7% ±0.6 | 23 | 40 | 43 | 155 |
| #10 |
|
247 | 4.5% ±0.5 | 106 | 21 | 115 | 5 |
| #11 |
Chelsea Fertility NYC
Claude 9
ChatGPT 3
Gemini 2
Perplexity 231
|
245 | 4.4% ±0.5 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 231 |
| #12 |
Spring Fertility
Claude 131
ChatGPT 1
Gemini 7
Perplexity 96
|
235 | 4.2% ±0.5 | 131 | 1 | 7 | 96 |
| #13 |
|
225 | 4.1% ±0.5 | 192 | 2 | 25 | 6 |
| #14 |
|
211 | 3.8% ±0.5 | 21 | 0 | 149 | 41 |
| #15 |
|
179 | 3.2% ±0.5 | 105 | 3 | 69 | 2 |
| #16 |
|
146 | 2.6% ±0.4 | 87 | 10 | 46 | 3 |
| #17 |
|
145 | 2.6% ±0.4 | 135 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| #18 |
Tanmoy Mukherjee
Claude 119
ChatGPT 14
Gemini 1
Perplexity 2
|
136 | 2.5% ±0.4 | 119 | 14 | 1 | 2 |
| #19 |
Kofinas Fertility Group
Claude 16
ChatGPT 21
Gemini 17
Perplexity 77
|
131 | 2.4% ±0.4 | 16 | 21 | 17 | 77 |
| #20 |
|
126 | 2.3% ±0.4 | 52 | 25 | 12 | 37 |
| #21 |
|
118 | 2.1% ±0.4 | 34 | 0 | 80 | 4 |
| #22 |
|
98 | 1.8% ±0.3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 90 |
| #23 |
|
95 | 1.7% ±0.3 | 10 | 1 | 83 | 1 |
| #24 |
GENESIS Fertility & Reproductive Medicine
Claude 1
ChatGPT 25
Gemini 5
Perplexity 62
|
93 | 1.7% ±0.3 | 1 | 25 | 5 | 62 |
| #25 |
Generation Next
Claude 1
ChatGPT 1
Gemini 43
Perplexity 47
|
92 | 1.7% ±0.3 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 47 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 90 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 87 mentions · 1.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 73 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 72 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 72 mentions · 1.3% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 69 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 66 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 66 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 60 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 60 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 57 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 55 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 52 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 49 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 48 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 47 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 45 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 45 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 44 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 43 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 42 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 42 mentions · 0.8% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 41 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 41 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #50 |
Innovation Fertility Preservation and IVF
www.fertilitypreservation.org
40 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs
|
40 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs |
| #51 | 40 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 39 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 36 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #62 |
Montefiore Einstein Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health
Unverified
31 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs
|
31 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs |
| #63 | 29 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 29 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 29 mentions · 0.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 28 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #70 |
Cornell University Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine
Unverified
27 mentions · 0.5% · 1/4 AIs
|
27 mentions · 0.5% · 1/4 AIs |
| #71 | 26 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 26 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 26 mentions · 0.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 25 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 25 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 25 mentions · 0.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 20 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #95 |
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
www.gairgair.com
20 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs
|
20 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs |
| #96 | 19 mentions · 0.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 19 mentions · 0.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 19 mentions · 0.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 19 mentions · 0.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 19 mentions · 0.3% · 3/4 AIs |
1,336 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. SART.org
62 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. CDC ART
31 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. FertilityIQ
fertilityiq.com
21 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Bonei Olam
21 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Resolve: The National Infertility Association
19 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Reddit
14 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
14 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. Yelp
12 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. New York State Department of Health
9 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. Healthgrades
healthgrades.com
5 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. Zocdoc
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. Joint Commission
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. American Association of Tissue Banks
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. The American Fertility Association NYC Women’s Mind/Body Support Group
the american fertility association nyc women’s mind
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
In-depth report
How AI recommends IVF & Fertility in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Why AI Recommendations Change Between Runs (and When a Change Is Real)
An assistant is not a laminated directory. Search results move, generated wording varies, and a tiny prompt edit can change the shortlist. The answer is not to...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v1.0 · latest snapshot: 1,128 AI responses and 20,259 business mentions · all-time corpus: 5,558 responses and 22,652 business mentions · Sep 7, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.